The best run down of what happened on Tuesday when the Texas House debated HB 5 come from Kuff, House passes major changes to testing and graduation requirements. (Be sure and read the post it has many links).
Like I said, I’m still thinking about all this. To say the least, it’s a big and complicated subject, and I don’t claim any particular expertise. I am certain that there will be differences with the Senate bill, and there will be much horse-trading in conference committee. Reducing the number of exams, and aligning them with college admissions makes sense to me. Providing viable alternate paths to high school graduation that prepare kids for a professional career and aren’t viewed as lesser achievements is a good idea, too. I feel confident that whatever we do this session, we’ll be revisiting it next session, and likely again after that.
From Burka it seems to be that this is a fight between two (monied) factions.
There are two competing visions of the future of public education in Texas at stake in the debate over HB 5, which begins this morning on the House floor. One side is a group of industries calling themselves Jobs for Texas. Foremost among this group is the Texas Association of Manufacturers. The other side is Pearson, the testing company, and the Texas Association of Business and Chambers of Commerce, led by Bill Hammond.
And, as Diane Ravitch points out, the teachers are who will have to deal with the consequences, How Texas Legislators Debated Graduation Requirements.
I couldn’t help but think back to my own experience in Texas public schools many years ago (to be exact, I graduated from San Jacinto High School in 1956). To the best of my knowledge, the Legislature set minimum requirements and left the details to educators.
These days, legislators in Congress and the states seem to think they must decide everything in education and tell educators what to do. When I was in North Carolina last week, the dean of the UNC education school told me that the legislature passed laws requiring that students learn cursive writing and memorize the multiplication tables.
It is a good thing the legislators are not telling doctors how to make their diagnoses and conduct surgical procedures.
This is nowhere near over, and there was no discussion of poverty, hunger, and making sure students are showing up ready to learn.
A resolution filed by state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer (D-San Antonio) yesterday, which addresses the need to take up school finance sooner rather than later, is making early session news. Kuff does a good job of wrapping up the latest, School districts are still a long way from getting relief.
As expected, Rep. Martinez-Fischer filed HR 408 yesterday to encourage the Lege to appropriate the money it had cut in 2011 without waiting for the Supreme Court to rule. You can read the press statement from MALC here. In his oddball iconoclastic way, Republican Rep. David Simpson is with the Dems on taking action now. More than half of that $8.8 billion in surplus funds from 2011 that resulted from Comptroller Combs’ gross underestimation of available revenue has now been marked to pay our outstanding Medicaid bills, so a full restoration of public ed money would need to involve the Rainy Day fund and/or current revenues, at least in part. That doesn’t make the debate any less worth having, of course. I don’t expect this to actually happen – the Lege will fund enrollment growth, and there may be some funds restored for things like pre-K – but the more we debate it, the better. We can help schools now, we don’t have to wait. It’s our choice.
Any talk of where The Lege stands on defunding public education since 2011 must be looked at in context. It must be looked at through the lens of a conservative movement that has always found public education distasteful at best, and unconstitutional at worst. That’s why last session, for them, was seen as the opportunity of a lifetime to gut public education funding in Texas. And once this issue is understood in that context, it’s easy to see whey they are in absolutely no hurry to reinstate funding for publie education.
It is also why the Texas GOP seems just fine with the fact that Texas Comptroller Susan Combs missed the mark so badly on the revenue estimate in 2011 – opportunity of a lifetime. Here’s how that is stated in HR 408 by Martinez Fischer:
The 2011 revenue estimate was inaccurate and, as a direct result, public schools received an unjustified $5.4 billion dollar budget cut and there is nearly $8.8 billion unspent from last biennium, some of which could be used to help our Texas schools
It certainly can be. But only if enough members of the GOP in The Lege thought there was actually a need for this money to be reinstated. And their words and actions prove they don’t, Democrats file resolution on school finance, House doesn’t vote on it.
Republicans, who took to the House floor Monday to say they will make public education a priority, want to wait until the Supreme Court rules before they tackle any school finance changes.
Rep. Brandon Creighton, a Republican from Conroe and chairman of the GOP Caucus, said in a press release that the Democrats’ idea to address school finance before a final court ruling would be like “putting a Band-Aid on a ‘45-year broken leg.’”
Mark Jones, a political science professor at Rice University, said Democrats don’t have the numbers to force a vote.
“They won’t be able to stop the Republicans,” Jones said, but they could score political points by trying to force Republicans to vote in opposition to quickly restoring funding to K-12 education.
What’s also going on is Speaker Joe Straus is doing his best to protect his members from what is seen to be a politically damaging vote before the 2014 GOP Primary.
The Republican leadership recognizes the trap and will do its best to side-step it. The GOP will also use parliamentary procedure to block votes and argue that rewriting school finance laws while there is ongoing litigation is foolish.
Privately, Republicans say they want to delay any action on school finance for as long as possible and are considering stalling tactics. Abbott can do Republican lawmakers a favor and slow-peddle the appeals process to make sure the lawsuit lasts well into 2014. Then Gov. Rick Perry can call a special legislative session after the 2014 primaries and before the 2014 general election.
Such a special session would allow Republican lawmakers to vote for a school finance overhaul that boosts spending after they’ve made it past the notoriously conservative Republican primary voter. They would also solve the school finance problem before Democrats could attack them for not taking care of public schools, one of the most important issues for the general election voter.
That’s right the GOP sees no need to hurry and fix the problems that were put in motion by Combs’ bad revenue estimate, which are continuing to hurt public education in Texas. This shows clearly the difference between the two parties on public education. It’s almost like the GOP doesn’t care about public education. Opportunity of a lifetime.
No matter how much money the state of Texas brings in our current state leaders, and the Texas GOP have no intention of ever restoring funding for public education. Texas’ GOP budget writers are in no hurry to restore billions cut from schools.
Republican leaders heading into the new legislative session say they are in no hurry to undo billions of dollars in cuts to public schools made two years ago.
Despite pressure from teacher groups and others, top lawmakers cited holes they must patch in the current budget, a general caution about higher spending and a desire to see how courts rule in the latest suit over how the state funds education.
Many school districts, pointing to an improved Texas economy, are seeking relief. But key budget-writers say the initial two-year plan they’ll unveil soon won’t replace the $5.4 billion the last Legislature sliced from state maintenance and operation aid and discretionary grants.
That means no substantial help to handle bigger classes and no restored grants for half-day prekindergarten and remedial instruction, decisions that are expected to rekindle tensions with school advocates calling for more money.
“The introduced bill won’t have that,” though it may include an additional $1 billion or so to cover student enrollment growth, said Rep. Jim Pitts, the Waxahachie Republican who heads the budget-writing Appropriations Committee.
Pitts said he expects Comptroller Susan Combs’ two-year revenue estimate, which limits what lawmakers can spend, “to be pretty conservative, and so we’re being very conservative.”
Sen. Tommy Williams, who recently became chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said he’s skeptical of claims by teacher organizations that the cuts have “devastated” schools.
Some Republicans’ patience with superintendents and district officials may be wearing thin.
“I don’t like it, I’m not crazy about the school districts’ suing the state,” Williams said. “They’d be a lot better served if they’d come down here and try to work this out.”
Linda Bridges, president of the Texas AFT teachers’ union, said the education lobby decided not to sue before the 2011 session and was hammered with budget cuts.
She said some classrooms today have as many as 40 children, and grants have been eliminated for programs to improve student success, even as lawmakers demand reductions in dropout rates and higher test scores.
The Legislature, whether run by Democrats or Republicans, rarely has boosted spending in great numbers without a court edict threatening the unthinkable, such as closure of the state’s more than 9,000 public schools, Bridges said.
“It doesn’t seem they know how to respond to issues like this without being forced to by a court,” she said.
Rep. Mark Strama, D-Austin, said GOP leaders probably are posturing, comparing it to the initial House proposal two years ago for $9 billion in school cuts.
“The story became the restoration of some of the cuts instead of focusing on how can we cut $5.4 billion from education in a school system that we’re holding to higher and higher standards,” said Strama, a member of the Public Education Committee.
“That was actually a smart political strategy to sell a dumb public policy.”
Strama said Republican leaders may ease up some when a final budget starts taking shape.
Don’t count on it, though, said Rep. Charles Perry, a Lubbock Republican who, with tea party support, upset an ally to Speaker Joe Straus two years ago — and then beat him again in a primary rematch this year.
“It’s not going to happen,” he said. “We’re not going to do any restoration.”
Strama is right about the ploy from last session – propose deep cuts at first, and then lessen those cuts in the end to make them look better. But the GOP has no intention of ever putting that money back. It will take another party in power to put that money back.
The Texas GOP haven’t spent decades gaining control of our state government, starting to implement their agenda, just to start rolling it back once the economy improves. The only thing that will restore public education in Texas will be changing who we elect in Texas.
Pimentel at the Express-News on what vouchers will do to Texas public education, Choice program is a suicide pact for schools. Suffice it to say that the jury is still out on vouchers, as far as whether they’re a solution or will just cause more problems. No matter how they’re structured they are likely to take money from public education. And, as noted below, an accountability mechanism will need to be setup.
But the main thing he points to is this:
The Texas Constitution. Here’s what Article 7, Section I says, after a brief preamble about the preservation of the liberties and rights of the people: “It shall be the duty of the Legislature of the State to establish and make suitable provision for the support and maintenance of an efficient system of public free schools.”
It’s hard to make the case that public funds to private schools constitute an “efficient system of public free schools,” particularly since it’s an open question whether these private scholarships for low-income children will cover full tuition at these private schools.
Of course, some schools may simply write off the balance but others may not. If they don’t, how is this “free?” And if there is a balance to pay, how is this a program for low-income children?
And as he points out any “pilot program” is just a wedge for further expansion of vouchers in the future. The point is, putting government money into a private system, is unlikely to make our system of public free schools more efficient. And it’s not clear the votes in the Texas House will be there, Clash over vouchers comes down to vastly different views on Texas schools.
Democrats in the House and Senate will likely line up against all private school voucher and tuition tax credit bills, but they are in the minority in both chambers.
Rural GOP lawmakers also have also been cool to vouchers in the past.
In 2007, the House voted overwhelmingly to ban use of state funds for private schools — an action that halted all discussion of vouchers in Texas until now.
While Perry and Dewhurst, leader of the Senate, have signaled their support for expanded school choice, House Speaker Joe Straus is taking a more cautious approach, citing previous battles in the House over vouchers.
“If there is not a broad consensus on the issue, then I don’t see a House voucher bill coming” up for a vote, said Straus, R-San Antonio.
“That’s not to say there isn’t a possibility that we can work on an expanded school choice program of some sort. But I want to avoid a scene on the floor over a voucher bill that is not broadly supported.”
One reason vouchers are being pushed so hard, more than likely, is that people already sending their children to private school would like some of their tax money to go to their children’s tuition. What’s lost in all of this is that “vouchers” or “choice” still does not solve any of the problems with public school finance. And the issues with how the public is being educated has more to do with poverty, then anything else.
Most private schools don’t want public school cast offs – like special needs or poor kids filling their schools. They would, more than likely, just take from the cream of the crop from public education. And public education is the only entity that has the means to deal with the masses. What this will likely lead to is a class based education system.
Which leads us back to what public education should be. Public education takes a commitment from the public – parents, teachers, grand parents and those without children in school. It’s something we choose to do today as a society, educate all children, so everyone we all have a better future. Vouchers are the wrong choice.
The Coalition for Public Schools.
Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst recently said that The Lege should consider dipping into the Economic Stabilization Fund, aka Rainy Day Fund, to pay for water and transportation needs.
Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst said Thursday that Texas should consider dipping into the state’s multi-billion dollar rainy day fund to address pressing water and transportation needs.
Dewhurst, speaking before the Dallas Regional Chamber, proposed using $1 billion from the fund, which could reach $8 billion by the end of the year, to create a new water infrastructure development bank to help cities and other municipalities build reservoirs. [Emphasis added]
Joining House Speaker Joe Straus and other state leaders in focusing on the major challenges surrounding Texas’ brisk population growth, the lieutenant governor said it might also make sense to develop a similar bank for highway construction projects.
[You can watch it here.] The business community has been signalling for a while they their willing to give the Texas GOP a pass on raising taxes for either of these issues. They all understand that they need water and roads for their new developments. And they prefer Texas taxpayers to pay for it.
But don’t expect public education to get the same treatment, School districts suing the state point finger at Texas Legislature.
John Folks, former president of the Texas Association of School Administrators and former superintendent of the Northside school district in San Antonio — the state’s fourth-largest district — placed much of the blame for current problems with state lawmakers. It started with the “structural deficit” they created in 2006 when they lowered property taxes and replaced the lost revenue with a new business tax that never produced enough money, he said.
Folks, named Texas superintendent of the year in 2011 by the Texas Association of School Boards, said the Legislature miscalculated by billions of dollars how much revenue the new business tax would raise. Lawmakers were let off the hook when they were able to use federal stimulus money to make up the shortfall in 2009, but the huge financial hole came back in 2011, according to Folks.
Mr. Folks gets most of that right. What he gets wrong is who let lawmakers off the hook. The people of Texas did. There’s has been little – and what there was has been wiped out by the tea party wave of 2012 – electoral punishment for those who voted for the structural deficit that has decimated public education. It should also be noted that The Lege knew when they passed the GOP tax swap scheme of 2006 that it would come up short.
The plan has always been to defund public education (and the safety net), and they’re are not going to allow it to be refunded as long as they hold power. Anyone who thinks they will is just fooling themselves.
One more thing. A report was just released by Good Jobs First called, SELLING SNAKE OIL TO THE STATES: The American Legislative Exchange Council’s Flawed Prescriptions for Prosperity. It tells basically how the Texas economy is a hoax.
A new study finds that state tax and regulatory policies recommended by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) fail to promote stronger job creation or income growth, and actually predict a worse performance.
Since ALEC first published its annual Rich States, Poor States study with its Economic Outlook Ranking in 2007, states that were rated better have actually done worse economically.
“We tested ALEC’s claims against actual economic results,” said Dr. Peter Fisher, primary author of the study. “We conclude that eliminating progressive taxes, suppressing wages, and cutting public services are actually a recipe for economic inequality, declining incomes, and undermining public infrastructure and education that really matter for long-term economic growth.”
Texas has been able to paper over quite a bit of this because of the oil boom. Which is the history of Texas’ economic success. When oil isn’t booming either has Texas, most times. While Texas Gov. Rick Perry is running around squawking about what be believes he’s done to help the economy, the truth is much different. What he’s done has just made the rich in Texas richer and kept the rest of us struggling.
Of course what’s not, and hasn’t been discussed for a while in all of this, is what’s best for the people of Texas. This is still the best way forward, The Best Choice For A Prosperous Texas. But nothing close to that will be on the agenda in January. There’s is little if anything good that will come out of the upcoming session for average working Texans. And little will until we change who governs our state.
As the school finance case over public education funding in Texas continues, we need to take a reasoned look at the root cause of problems for public education. To do that I would recommend watching this conversation between Evan Smith and Diane Ravitch. In listening to the conversation it’s not that anything is wrong with the education system. Ravitch says that, “The great lie is that our public education system is failing”. She says the main problem is the fact that 25% of children live in poverty, and schools are no to blame for that.
She discussed poverty in the context of improving test scores and learning, and the best way to do that is to make sure children show up ready to learn. But for that we must go back to the beginning. She stated that while we need to spend more money, it’s more important what we’re spending the money on. She singled out three things: early childhood education, pre-natal care, and having a school nurse and health clinic on site. Being healthy and prepared is necessary for quality learning once they get to public school. But the need to reduce poverty was evident she said, “To the extent we can reduce poverty we will see test scores go up”, and that, “Test scores mirror socio-economic disparity”. And last that, “Kids aren’t learning because they’re sick, homeless, hungry, or a parent is in jail…we ignore all those problems and blame the schools”.
In Texas 26% of children live in poverty and Texas ranks 44th among the states in overall child health and well-being. So it’s no wonder that we are having problems educating our children in Texas. Ravitch’s overriding point was that the problem isn’t with our public education system, but it’s with the rising number of our citizens that are living in poverty. It’s a societal issue, rather then an education issue, and that’s much harder for Texans and Americans to admit and fix then just blaming schools.
She goes on to discuss how test scores and graduation rates are higher then they’ve ever been. And that most of the reason people think that the education system is failing is because the “echo chamber” has been repeating that for 20-plus years, and that too many have now come to believe that falsehood. She also pointed out that teachers are overworked, and for the most part under paid. And that where the education is the best in our country is where the teacher’s unions are the strongest.
On the subject of choice and charter schools, which she was once for, she now is against. Here are her reasons:
- They don’t on average get better results than public schools.
- They keep out special education students and the disabled.
- They keep out English language learners, skimming.
- It’s developing an dual school system based on class.
She goes on to say that choice advocates are the biggest proponents of the system if failing lie. And some are in it to make money, and others for ideological reasons and/or idealistic reasons. But her strongest argument was that school privatization can destroy public education which is an “essential democratic institution of our society”.
This is an extremely large amount of information, and maybe new information for some, to take in. It really lays out the extent of the societal problems we face in educating our children. And poverty is rarely talked about when discussing the problems with education in our society. While taxes and per student spending need to be fixed, fixing poverty is the most important issue, and needs to be fixed first when discussing the problem we face in public education.
The Myth of Charter Schools.
Austerity for thee, but not for me. Via the DMN, Audit: Texas governor, AG, land commissioner boosted staffs as state workers’ overall numbers shrank.
As the state’s workforce in areas such as education and protective services was shrinking last year, some agencies led by elected officeholders were growing.
Texas agencies shed about 3,200 workers in the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31, a reduction of about 2.1 percent, a new report from the state’s auditor shows. But the governor’s office, the attorney general’s office and the general land office — each run by a Republican elected while touting the virtues of shrinking government — added workers.
Aides to Gov. Rick Perry, Attorney General Greg Abbott and Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson stressed Tuesday that each remains below hiring maximums set by the Legislature.
That’s right do as I say, not as I do. There’s more.
Former state District Judge Scott McCown of Austin, who runs the Center for Public Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank, said he doesn’t begrudge successes by Perry, Abbott and Patterson at getting a few more employees.
“They needed more staff and had the clout to get them, while human service agencies had the need, but not the clout,” McCown said. [Emphasis added]
“You can’t achieve the same efficiencies in public services as in many businesses because the job is fundamentally different,” he said. “You can’t eliminate staff and more efficiently remove a child from an abusive home. Someone has to walk that child out the door hand in hand.”
The Department of Family and Protective Services, which includes Child Protective Services, lost 112 employees last year, a decrease of 1 percent. CPS is struggling to retain caseworkers and has had to pull workers from Dallas and Houston to manpower-shortage areas such as Austin and Midland.
Other major departments absorbed much bigger reductions, including the Texas Education Agency (down 24 percent), the Juvenile Justice Department (13 percent), Parks and Wildlife (5 percent) and the Department of Aging and Disability Services (4 percent), Keel’s audit shows.
Gary Anderson, president of the Texas Public Employee Association, said lawmakers and the governor “have absolute control” over general state government but not over public universities, colleges and school districts, which have other sources of income than the state.
Agencies for the most part “continue to meet the mission,” even with fewer hands, said Anderson, whose group calls itself the oldest and largest state employee group and not a union. “There are some problem areas,” he said, citing the prison system’s inability to retain guards, especially in the booming oilfields of South Texas, where they can easily double their salaries.
It’s pretty clear that these three “small government conservatives” only want everyone else’s agency to go through austerity. As Kuff points out today, they’ve had no problem taking in out on public educaiton, Eight billion dollars.
That’s how much is needed per year to make public education whole.
All this came from direct testimony – the state had not had the chance to cross-examine Moak as of the writing of those stories – so there will likely be more of these depressing numbers to come. The Moak, Casey website is a pretty good resource for following the trial on a blow-by-blow basis. Here’s an interesting tidbit from their embedded Twitter feed: “Moak: from 10-11 to 11-12 school year, 26.5k fewer teachers and staff while Texas schools added 44.5k students #schoolfinancetrial #txlege”. With numbers like that, what happened next should not surprise us.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Perry, Abbott, Patterson.
Link to report, A Summary Report on Full-time Equivalent State Employees for the Quarter Ending August 31, 2012.
Texas Comptroller Susan Combs has released a report on public education debt in Texas. To hear her tell it the debt for public education in Texas is getting out of control. But she’s only releasing the report so the uninformed, (to put it nicely), people of Texas will know the debt it going up. Or as she calls it, transparency. From the press release, Comptroller Issues Report on Education Debt in Texas.
Today Texas Comptroller Susan Combs released the third report in a series focused on transparency entitled Texas It’s Your Money. The report, “Your Money and Education Debt,” provides a snapshot of how much debt public and higher education institutions in Texas are carrying. The report also includes recommendations intended to provide greater transparency regarding education-related public debt in Texas and reduce debt across public and higher education.
Outstanding debt issued by Texas public schools and Texas institutions of higher learning is mounting faster than the general rate of inflation and the growth of enrollment. Public school districts have the largest outstanding share of local government debt in Texas.
“Public education is a critically important function of the state, and taxpayer dollars should always be spent prudently,” said Combs. “Construction costs are a large portion of school debt and we should all strive to spend efficiently and effectively.”
“Educating young Texans is crucial to the state’s continued economic success, but we must also ensure costs do not over-burden Texas taxpayers and families,” Combs said.
Although some public school districts, community and junior colleges, and public colleges and universities provide clear notice of new projects they plan to fund with long-term debt, taxpayers are not always aware of the magnitude of the debt being issued.
To improve transparency so that taxpayers can decide whether public and higher education institutions are meeting the responsibility of managing debt as prudently and conservatively as possible…
But it’s pretty clear to anyone who reads the report, why public education debt is skyrocketing in Texas. This is from page 7 of the report.
From 2001 to 2011, average property tax rates for debt service (Interest & Sinking or I&S rates) rose from 9.5 to 17.6 cents per $100 property value, an 86 percent increase. This represents an average annual growth rate of 6.4 percent.
By law, Maintenance & Operations (M&O) property tax rates were compressed downward between 2005 and 2007, from an average of $1.46 per $100 in 2005 to $1.04 in 2007.
This compression in M&O rates allowed school districts to raise debt service rates with taxpayers still seeing a decrease in their total tax rates. Debt service rates rose from 11.2 cents to 14.5 cents per $100 between 2005 and 2007, a 30.1 percent increase.
The bulk of the debt service increase occurred between 2006 and 2007, jumping from 11.9 cents to 14.5 cents per $100, an increase of 22.3 percent in one
The graph on page 7 really shows it, as taxes go down the debt skyrockets. The law that made that happen what the GOP tax swap scheme of 2006. It created a structural deficit in the state budget and the money that was taken away from schools to “lower” property taxes was made up in debt. It’s just the conservative principal of lowering taxes and paying for government with debt.
Combs is trying to use the debt created by the GOP in Texas as another cudgel to beat cuts out of public education. Oh and as an attempt to further her political career. Don’t buy it.
Comptroller Report Examines College, Public School Debt.
Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst made his move for reelection last week. In an attempt to ingratiate himself with the tea party that runs the Texas GOP primary these day he’s going to try and give them their ultimate wish. Ending public education as we know it in Texas.
Dewhurst, in a statement, said, “Education will be the hallmark issue of 2013 legislative session, and I believe Sen. Dan Patrick is uniquely qualified to tackle this urgent issue. Texas must change course. Texans must have choices in the education of their children. It is time for bold changes, and I intend to work with Sen. Patrick to shake up the status quo in education and ensure the promise of a world-class education for Texas.”
Patrick has served on the Senate Education Committee since 2007 and has been vice chair for the past four years.
“My focus will be on accountability with flexibility, education through innovation, more local control tied to local responsibility and the opportunity for families to choose the school that best fits the needs of their child,” Patrick said in a statement.
Vouchers long have been controversial in Texas and elsewhere. Education associations in the state view them as an effort to dismantle the public school system by diverting state money into privately operated enterprises.
“We’re convinced from our own studies that vouchers are not the right choice for Texas,” said F. Scott McCown, executive director of the Center for Public Policy Priorities, an Austin-based research organization with a progressive perspective.
“Vouchers bleed off money that’s needed to have strong public schools,” McCown said. “They don’t provide real choice for low-income students because of problems like transportation and parental engagement, and they don’t work at all in small-town Texas, where there’s only going to be one school, and it’s the public school. We believe vouchers are a stalking-horse for middle- and upper-income parents fleeing public schools and leaving them a wreck.”
Via the Turth About Schools they point us to a couple of Viewpoints on School Choice, Vouchers.
Today’s news brings two thoughtful commentaries on the issue of school choice (vouchers, unlimited charter schools): one from a school board member and one from a superintendent.
Each writer voices concern and encourages parents, citizens, and elected officials to consider carefully the impact vouchers will have on the system of public schools in our state.
Read their thoughts here and here.
One conservative blogger says that Dewhursts move isn’t sitting well with Senators across party lines, Rumblings In the Texas Senate: Is Dewhurst in Trouble?
I bring this up because anyone who follows Texas politics knows that Lt. Governor Dewhurst released his committee chairmanship picks last week. A lot of members are not happy – especially with naming Senator Dan Patrick to lead the Texas Education Committee. Many Senator’s are saying that his selection is a direct result of Patrick’s verbal assault on Ted Cruz during the US Senate race run-off and is a payback for it and his endorsement. I am told Senators are publicly discussing changing the rules to take power away from Dewhurst. And if you do not think there are enough moderate R’s and all the D’s to do it you cannot count.
Politics is largely about scratching backs – you scratch mine and I scratch yours. But this is a little blatant since Patrick has little to no experience dealing with education. He is a huge proponent of vouchers, he wants to replace the property tax by increasing the sales tax and is seen by Democrats and moderate Republicans as unstable and hard to work with. Patrick was very hostile to Speaker Joe Straus last session and this could be an attempt to blame any lack of education reform at the feet of the House of Representatives.
At the end of the day – if enough Senators are upset enough by the appointments Dewhurst made they could very easily take his power away and make his last session as the Lt. Governor more humiliating than his crushing defeat to Cruz.
One thing is obvious, Dewhurst believes he has to move to the right to keep the Tea Party types satisfied. As he does he alienates his Senate colleagues and looks like a fool doing
Dewhurst really has no choice. There are not enough moderates left that vote in the Texas GOP primary to save him from the tea party. That’s life in today’s Texas GOP.
It’s frustrating at times being a Democrat in Texas. One reason is that issues of significance rarely get discussed rationally. I didn’t watch the US Senate debate last week between Democrat Paul Sadler and Republican Ted Cruz, but judging from what’s been reported, (blogs, MSM, Twitter, etc..), the main takeaways were that it was between disgraceful and over the top.
But one thing that came out of the debate, which always seems to, is the Democrat having to apologize for, somewhere in their political career,wanting to make Texas a more fair state. Sadler, early in his political career before it became a scarlet letter “T”, made sane arguments for studying and possibly implementing a statewide property or income tax to pay for public education and make taxes more fair in Texas. Blasphemer!!
A Nov. 24, 1992, commentary by Dave McNeely of the Austin American-Statesman opens: “It’s against the grain of the conventional political wisdom in Texas. Many consider it political suicide. But freshman state Rep. Paul Sadler, D-Henderson, is advocating an income tax to fund public schools. Openly.”
Sadler had studied education funding, the column says, and concluded that a broad-based statewide tax was needed as an alternative to plans, like the system ultimately passed into law, to transfer property-tax revenue gathered in some school districts to other districts.
McNeely quoted Sadler as saying he favored the merger of some school districts, using incentives, and the creation of a statewide funding source, “either a statewide property tax or a state income tax, which is the fairest of all methods, because it puts everyone in the scheme.”
The column also quotes Sadler as saying the income tax would have to be sold to voters via a statewide TV blitz buttressed by lawmaker discussions with constituents and educators — to “tell them ‘this is what we’re doing, this is why, and this is where we want to go with education, and this is how it will benefit you.’”
“If you do that, you could educate the public,” Sadler said. “We’ve not tried to do that, and so what you get from the constituency oftentimes is a knee-jerk reaction: ‘No, I don’t want an income tax’ — even though they don’t fully understand the relief they’ll get from local property taxes and other taxes.
“And it is the fear of an income tax, from a legislator’s standpoint, and having to face an opponent that will beat you over the head with that, that keeps most legislators from speaking out and saying what we all know is true,” Sadler said.
What is left out above from the 1992 commentary is that this was being discussed as an alternative to recapture, what we know now as “Robin Hood”. A totally rational and sane argument for fixing public school finance in Texas – which is still broken and a statewide property tax is again being discussed – that is now seen as radical and a disqualifying stance for public office. This was way before the 2006 GOP tax swap scheme that created an annual $5 billion structural shortfall and, n o matter how the GOP tries to spin it, before they cut $5 billion from public education in 2011.
What I don’t understand is why, when confronted by these types of things, Democrats cower instead of fighting. Instead saying something like:
You’re damn right I supported implementing a solution that would have fixed our disastrous public school finance system once and for all. We wouldn’t be facing another court challenge as we speak. Working Texans overall tax burdens would be significantly lower than they are now, as would property taxes, if we would have instituted a truly progressive state income tax 20 years ago.
Either way Sadler has little chance of getting to the US Senate. But it would be better for Democrats in the long run, if statewide Democrats would start espousing distinctly different policies from the GOP. GOP state Sen. Robert Duncan recently proposed a constitutional amendment creating a state property tax to pay for public schools.
It’s the same on many fronts. Transportation, everyone knows our transportation infrastructure in Texas is woefully underfunded and is costing us more doing nothing than paying a few more pennies per gallon would to fix it. See (The cost of neglect keeps rising, Forgotten Mission: Texas’ trickle-down transportation policy, and My afternoon at the Texas Tribune Festival). And the latest study on the subject here, Study: Inadequate Roads Cost Texans Billions.
Issues including traffic congestion, damage to vehicles from roads needing repair and costs incurred in accidents caused by insufficient safety features on roadways cost drivers in Texas $23 billion annually, according to a study released Tuesday by a national transportation research group.
“Texas has fallen behind in relieving traffic congestion on its major roadways and maintaining pavement conditions on these roads,” said Frank Moretti, director of Policy and Research at TRIP, the group that conducted the study.
The study suggests the condition of Texas roads could be costing individual motorists as much as $2,000 a year.
It also says the condition of Texas roads will worsen without increased funding, a difficult prospect given the state’s budget challenges. Pavement quality, for instance, is projected to decrease 30 percent statewide over the next decade given current funding. A recent study conducted by Texas A&M University and cited in the TRIP study suggests traffic congestion, which can cost motorists as much as 38 hours a year in urban areas, is likely to double statewide in the next decade.
Moretti said much of the increased use of Texas roadways is business-related.
“The tremendous energy boom being experienced in Texas, while great for the state, is putting a great amount of strain on Texas roadways.” According to TRIP’s study, addressing this increasing use will cost $2 billion annually.
And this is unlikely to change anytime soon.
“They [TRIP] still don’t address the main issue,” [State Rep. Joe Pickett, D-El Paso, who sits on the House Transportation Committee] said, “and that’s how we’re going to pay for it.” Pickett says that the lack of public awareness and an unwillingness to take some politically unpopular actions are the main reasons for funding shortfalls.
“The average Texan is paying $3 less a year in gas tax than they were in 1991,” he says, noting that few politicians would want to raise the tax when gas prices are so high. Pickett says he doesn’t expect the upcoming Legislature to solve the problem. “The Legislature is going to continue to kick the can down the road on this.”
While there are many issues that Democrats need to work on, the one that cuts to the core is that they no longer champion government as force that can make a difference in the people’s daily lives. As FDR put it, “Better the occasional faults of a government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.” It should not surprise anyone that far too many people have now begun to believe hat the government can no longer help them – conservatives have been repeating that lie for decades. Millions are helped by government every day. Because too many believe that lie, and see government as the enemy, the Democratic party is struggling to get to anywhere in Texas.
If a statewide income and/or income tax was “the fairest of all methods” back in 1992 it likely still is today, (see the best choice for a prosperous Texas). Too many of us have come to believe that the government can no longer help us. That is sad and untrue. The government, as we all should know, is a reflection of us as a people. If it has become cold, unfeeling, and unhelpful then we can all just look in the mirror to see what we have allowed our government to become. Democrats won’t win in Texas until they can show voters in this state that the government is on their side and can make a positive difference in their lives.
� Previous entries Next Page » Next Page »